Should We Consider a Slot for Tog!
Many anglers, I for one, return all my big tog. I'm not suggesting it's something we all should do, but is it something worth looking at? I personally don't think it's warranted. Not to mention I'm not in agreement with targeting certain year classes. After doing a bit of research I've found that older tog are high in mercury. Maybe the potters and pin hookers need to throw back the big ones being that they're feeding the nation? Hell, they have a different slot for coms in striped bass due to high PCB's, why not tog?
george@nyangler.com
www.nyangler.com - Your Secret Spot Online !
Hell, they have a different slot for coms in striped bass due to high PCB's, why not tog?
FWIW, I'm becoming a big fan of slots, but don't think in the case of tog, and the vast majority of salt water species that are NOT anadromous, that slots don't become much of a "Year Class" issue as with stripers. The striper spawn, being in fresh water, has all those salinity variables and pollution issues that impact striped bass spawning success.
Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
Very few keepers-none for me this fall. Did not fish as much as last year either.
The blackfish pots also need to be addressed but that is an issue for another day
The problem is that the moment they do finally get to 16.000", they go right in the bucket. Still, I believe we are on the right track, sort of - which would really improve if they'd only cut back on the illegal harvesting and excessive potting.
Also not wild about the "Rec/Make Believe Comms" being allowed to pull 25 15" fish every trip - mostly to pay their boat expenses. I know four guys that make very good money - and still feel the need to subsidize their boats on the backs of a slow-recovering species. I think that has to be severely curtailed. Its just BS, to me. Yeah, I said it. The truth hurts, sometimes.
BTW, are they STILL roller trawling over the offshore bottom? Because that technology destroyed nearly all of my drops at 17-Fathoms. Pounded them flat as a pancake.
I prefer fishing evolution to fishing extinction.
If ya want to clean up the water, ya gotta get the pigs out of the creek.
The fish over 16 are being taken. A slot limit would put the larger fish-mostly females back to spawn. It is worth trying over say a five year period to see if it helps Then open up the regs to allow one over slot limit fish to be retained
I also agree that the blackfish pots need to be addressed. The size limits for rec and commercial need to be consistant.
Yes, I agree, and at 66+ I have seen the same degradation of this fishery. I believe its because the fish have never been chased like they are today, with the better specimens being culled out at an increased rate vs years ago, thus leaving behind what appears to be a very solid population of youngins'.
Additionally, as already observed, over 16" and into the pail - "On the line means tonight we dine" - a commonly heard refrain.
I would never advocate for the taking of fish less than 16" - and the vast majority of the fish I've seen boxed the past several seasons are in the 16-21" class. I think this, along with the mandated 3/4-fish limit is a already a fairly solid and consistant "semi-naturally occurring" slot limit.
So how would a regulation-imposed slot limit help with this? Given the above paragraph's observations we are overwhelmingly already at such a limit, without the government getting even more involved.
Also, as I wrote in the pinned "Blackfish Pics" thread - "the fecudity of such a older fish is questionable - meaning that its ability to generate a good quantity of eggs is inferior to a much smaller fish. Not to say it would be sterile, but the eggs would probably be very diminished in both quantity and quality."
I've seen that type of statement several times and heard it while speaking with the actual researchers at NYDEC in Setauket. There was a time I sold them their larger scientific microscope systems (that's what I do, btw), so I spoke with those people fairly often.
Get rid of the illegal potting, better regulate the legal potting, curtain the Make-Believe Comms and stop the roller trawling. I believe those things, taken together, would have far greater impact than further crippling the recreational fishing.
But of course its far easier for a regulating entity to just further slash what the legit Recs can bring home.
Hey, its the easy "low-hanging fruit" of fish regulations.
I prefer fishing evolution to fishing extinction.
If ya want to clean up the water, ya gotta get the pigs out of the creek.
In most cases I think we have all observed that for most species the largest adults are usually the poorest table fare. So, I have no issues with slot limits either as long as they are based upon solid scientific data. As others have questioned, it seems to me there must be some reliable data indicating at what stage of its life a Blackfish produces the largest volume of viable eggs. Obviously, that is one key area where we should target our conservation efforts
I also feel there's much less enforcement out there and there's a bunch of guys who sell fish illegally.
I think closing the fishery in the spring was the best thing they ever did.
I also agree that the DEC enforcement has been lacking. Haven't seen the DEC in the mid sound in years. It is always the same old tired excuse. Not enough officers, they patrol too big an area, not enough resources. ect.
The DEC does not want to address the blackfish and potting issue so they don't bother patrolling.
I know in Florida, I never fish without a license. Enforcement is everywhere. For them, it's a priority. For us, not so much.
I have always been of the belief that as long as we are fishing hook and line, and the fish has the choice to bite it or not. No saltwater fishery has ever been hurt by hook and line only. Therefore I don't buy into how much better we are today at finding fish.
Back to the slot. The suggestion was made because anglers were so quick to jump on the bass slot, why not see how people feel about the same being made here?
My position is simple. We should stop potting during the spawning season. Next, let's switch the size limits to favor the recreational angler. Let the recreational hook and line angler have the 15-inch limit, and push the commercially caught tog to a 16-inch minimum.
Now is the time to do it as the fishery is trying hard to rebound.
george@nyangler.com
www.nyangler.com - Your Secret Spot Online !
So there's a lot of great points here. And to be clear I'm not suggesting we need it now. I totally agree with Leps assessment. The tog fishery is looking good right now. I think it bolsters the claims by many that tog spawn much earlier than the 13-inches as estimated by the ASMFC. Let's not forget, another great tool has been added to get a hold on the commercial tog fishery and that is they now must be tagged, just like a striped bass.
I have always been of the belief that as long as we are fishing hook and line, and the fish has the choice to bite it or not. No saltwater fishery has ever been hurt by hook and line only. Therefore I don't buy into how much better we are today at finding fish.
Back to the slot. The suggestion was made because anglers were so quick to jump on the bass slot, why not see how people feel about the same being made here?
My position is simple. We should stop potting during the spawning season. Next, let's switch the size limits to favor the recreational angler. Let the recreational hook and line angler have the 15-inch limit, and push the commercially caught tog to a 16-inch minimum.
Now is the time to do it as the fishery is trying hard to rebound.
Want to buy them out? Fine! Let's eliminate them and see what happens. This status quo with this very small segment of the comm sector needs to stop!!
Recs have bore the brunt of harsh regulations for decades. About time the roller gear and pot guys are forced to fish another way!
Want to buy them out? Fine! Let's eliminate them and see what happens. This status quo with this very small segment of the comm sector needs to stop!!
I would favor a slot. 16"-20" would be fare since most guys release larger fish anyway. Better yet release all the females, big or small, whatever amount of eggs they release will get fertilized. I personally release all my females and suggest to my crew to do the same, most agree with me. I believe the current tog regs are working. It been the best season in a long time here in Western LIS. Ya tons of shorts but alot are just barely. Next year should be even better.
The potting issue is another matter. It's not the legal pots that are the problem. For every string of pots you see there's 10 that you don't, aka ghost pots. I know 3 lobster guys that pull their gear with a grapnel and only in the dim hours. One guy from my harbor was caught 2 years ago tossing bags of blackfish while being chased by CT DEEP. He was caught, arrested fined and lost his 35' lobster boat. 6 months later he's back at it. The guy forfeited a $100k boat, tells me he makes a S***ton more than that a year. They sell 25 with tags and 150 without every day
.
george@nyangler.com
www.nyangler.com - Your Secret Spot Online !
Sign in to reply to this thread.