Mayor DiBazio lowered the speed limit nyc from 30 to 25 when he first took office...
School Zone, 6am to 10pm, mon-fri...
got one for doing 36mph in a 25mph, $50.00... and he wants my vote, the worse mayor ever in nyc... haha... cellie...
.
[ATTACH type="full"]9357[/ATTACH]
Speed Zone Cameras, NYC...
7,457 views·88 replies·by CELLFISH··
brand new speed camera ? Deblasio is gonna close the budget wit $50 buck fines...
ya think they would put warning signs & speed bumps first, dickks... there’s an obvious downgrade inda road, too... cellie...
.
[ATTACH type="full"]22707[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full"]22708[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full"]22709[/ATTACH]
ya think they would put warning signs & speed bumps first, dickks... there’s an obvious downgrade inda road, too... cellie...
.
[ATTACH type="full"]22707[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full"]22708[/ATTACH][ATTACH type="full"]22709[/ATTACH]
CommodoreOriginal Crew18,289 postsSince 2019
D
I do believe there must be a sign before the camera saying something like "photo enforcement" for the red light cameras there are. They are diamomd shape white background with a traffic light. Not sure about the speed cameras but likely there is a sign.
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
D
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
D
>
Hey what can I tell ya! He gotta get more revenue for the city so his wife can steal more.
Did He start them or were they in place before he came to office? Not really sure when they appeared
Hey what can I tell ya! He gotta get more revenue for the city so his wife can steal more.
Did He start them or were they in place before he came to office? Not really sure when they appeared
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
[[SIZE=7]**[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Vision Zero: Mayor de Blasio Announces New Speed Camera Law is now in Effect[/COLOR]**[/SIZE]]('https://www1.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/340-19/vision-zero-mayor-de-blasio-new-speed-camera-law-now-effect#:~:text=LadyNewsOfficials-,Vision%20Zero%3A%20Mayor%20de%20Blasio%20Announces%20New%20Speed,Law%20is%20now%20in%20Effect&text=NEW%20YORK%E2%80%94Mayor%20de%20Blasio,law%20is%20now%20in%20effect.&text=Were%20sending%20a%20message,speed%20or%20pay%20the%20price.%E2%80%9D')
[SIZE=4]**Wilhelm was mayor in 2014**[/SIZE]
[SIZE=4]**Wilhelm was mayor in 2014**[/SIZE]
CommodoreOriginal Crew9,821 postsSince 2018
>
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
The large majority of the red light camera violations are for people making a right turn on red without coming to a COMPLETE, WHEELS STOP ALL MOTION, stop.
I got a red light ticket after making a right turn on red. It was one of those intersections that had an illuminated sign saying "No Turn On Red" that goes out and allows a right turn on red depending on traffic. I made my right turn on red after the sign extinguished and got a ticket. I figured the system had malfunctioned. I went to court with photographs of the intersection and the video that was mailed to me. The video showed the sign extinguishing long before I made the turn. The judge said that wasn't the reason. In the video, you can see that my wheels never stopped turning. I was going at less of a speed as a 3 year old can peddle a tricycle. I got the ticket anyway. That is the rule.
That is where most of the income comes from. Not someone blowing through a red light and endangering the public. This was nothing to do with safety and only a $150 toll booth.
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
The large majority of the red light camera violations are for people making a right turn on red without coming to a COMPLETE, WHEELS STOP ALL MOTION, stop.
I got a red light ticket after making a right turn on red. It was one of those intersections that had an illuminated sign saying "No Turn On Red" that goes out and allows a right turn on red depending on traffic. I made my right turn on red after the sign extinguished and got a ticket. I figured the system had malfunctioned. I went to court with photographs of the intersection and the video that was mailed to me. The video showed the sign extinguishing long before I made the turn. The judge said that wasn't the reason. In the video, you can see that my wheels never stopped turning. I was going at less of a speed as a 3 year old can peddle a tricycle. I got the ticket anyway. That is the rule.
That is where most of the income comes from. Not someone blowing through a red light and endangering the public. This was nothing to do with safety and only a $150 toll booth.
First MateOriginal Crew568 postsSince 2018
>
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
I guess leftys never see any tax that they don't like, but the real problem is this bill of goods is being sold as primarily for safety and it's nothing of the kind. If they were really concerned about safety there are dozens of other things that could be done to improve safety. Better engineering of intersections would be a biggie, and really wouldn't cost much. In some other countries they have a countdown for when the light is going to change. I'm sure that does a lot more for preventing people misjudging red lights than bagging them for a nanosecond's miscalculation. But there's no money in that.
Oh, and I love this. Part of the website describing the camera system and the rules in Nassau County had videos of red light running incidents that's supposed to highlight the kind of thing these cameras are supposed to be capable of preventing. Guess what captured the videos? Uh huh, the red light cameras.
I looked for it, but it seems that it's gone now. Maybe somebody finally realized how stupid that argument was.
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
I guess leftys never see any tax that they don't like, but the real problem is this bill of goods is being sold as primarily for safety and it's nothing of the kind. If they were really concerned about safety there are dozens of other things that could be done to improve safety. Better engineering of intersections would be a biggie, and really wouldn't cost much. In some other countries they have a countdown for when the light is going to change. I'm sure that does a lot more for preventing people misjudging red lights than bagging them for a nanosecond's miscalculation. But there's no money in that.
Oh, and I love this. Part of the website describing the camera system and the rules in Nassau County had videos of red light running incidents that's supposed to highlight the kind of thing these cameras are supposed to be capable of preventing. Guess what captured the videos? Uh huh, the red light cameras.
I looked for it, but it seems that it's gone now. Maybe somebody finally realized how stupid that argument was.
CaptainOriginal Crew3,414 postsSince 2019
>
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
The truth is that the mayor and Corey Johnson are on some sort of anti-car crusade. I’m guessing that cars don’t exist in the kind of urban utopia that they are failing miserably to bring to fruition.
As far as your statement what these cameras don’t take into account is what is happening around my car. When a livery cab decides to stop in the middle lane of 1st Avenue to drop off or pickup a fare, there is a truck in the left lane, and my only option is to swerve into a bus lane in order to not get into an accident the camera can’t take that into account. Or how about that scooter/electric bike people whizzing around that we have to avoid?
Speed traps around schools is one thing. Cameras for every infraction of the law is a money grab plain and simple.
I said it once to a friend I will say it again here. So its a money grab so what. If you and everyone did the speed limit and stopped at red lights like they are supposed to the money would dry up. As soon as they stop making money and begin costing money they will go bye bye. Until then I say put em up all over the place. Eventually they will make the roads safer. Everyone will drive closer to the speed limit and people will actually know that a yellow light means prepare to stop not floor it to save 1 minute.
The truth is that the mayor and Corey Johnson are on some sort of anti-car crusade. I’m guessing that cars don’t exist in the kind of urban utopia that they are failing miserably to bring to fruition.
As far as your statement what these cameras don’t take into account is what is happening around my car. When a livery cab decides to stop in the middle lane of 1st Avenue to drop off or pickup a fare, there is a truck in the left lane, and my only option is to swerve into a bus lane in order to not get into an accident the camera can’t take that into account. Or how about that scooter/electric bike people whizzing around that we have to avoid?
Speed traps around schools is one thing. Cameras for every infraction of the law is a money grab plain and simple.
CommodoreOriginal Crew5,665 postsSince 2018
Avenger is correct 100%, RE : engineering...
that speed camera pole was installed so the lamppost is hiding it...
and did ya ever notice the yellow signal is only 3 seconds long without any difference to the speed limit and drops immediately into red... cellie...
.
that speed camera pole was installed so the lamppost is hiding it...
and did ya ever notice the yellow signal is only 3 seconds long without any difference to the speed limit and drops immediately into red... cellie...
.
CommodoreOriginal Crew18,289 postsSince 2019
D
>
I guess leftys never see any tax that they don't like, but the real problem is this bill of goods is being sold as primarily for safety and it's nothing of the kind. If they were really concerned about safety there are dozens of other things that could be done to improve safety. Better engineering of intersections would be a biggie, and really wouldn't cost much. In some other countries they have a countdown for when the light is going to change. I'm sure that does a lot more for preventing people misjudging red lights than bagging them for a nanosecond's miscalculation. But there's no money in that.
Oh, and I love this. Part of the website describing the camera system and the rules in Nassau County had videos of red light running incidents that's supposed to highlight the kind of thing these cameras are supposed to be capable of preventing. Guess what captured the videos? Uh huh, the red light cameras.
I looked for it, but it seems that it's gone now. Maybe somebody finally realized how stupid that argument was.
I only read the first line. It's not a tax. Obey the law. Come to a complete stop like the law says. Drive under the speed limit imposed. I guess conservatives feel laws are only for others. If you do this you won't have to pay your so called tax. Don't know why this is so hard for conservaitves.
I am not a lefty. If you feel that I am then you must be a hard right conservative. You don't know me. I vote the man or woman not the party. I bet you can't say that. And that makes you a hard right conservative and me not a lefty. Carry on
I guess leftys never see any tax that they don't like, but the real problem is this bill of goods is being sold as primarily for safety and it's nothing of the kind. If they were really concerned about safety there are dozens of other things that could be done to improve safety. Better engineering of intersections would be a biggie, and really wouldn't cost much. In some other countries they have a countdown for when the light is going to change. I'm sure that does a lot more for preventing people misjudging red lights than bagging them for a nanosecond's miscalculation. But there's no money in that.
Oh, and I love this. Part of the website describing the camera system and the rules in Nassau County had videos of red light running incidents that's supposed to highlight the kind of thing these cameras are supposed to be capable of preventing. Guess what captured the videos? Uh huh, the red light cameras.
I looked for it, but it seems that it's gone now. Maybe somebody finally realized how stupid that argument was.
I only read the first line. It's not a tax. Obey the law. Come to a complete stop like the law says. Drive under the speed limit imposed. I guess conservatives feel laws are only for others. If you do this you won't have to pay your so called tax. Don't know why this is so hard for conservaitves.
I am not a lefty. If you feel that I am then you must be a hard right conservative. You don't know me. I vote the man or woman not the party. I bet you can't say that. And that makes you a hard right conservative and me not a lefty. Carry on
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
D
>
The truth is that the mayor and Corey Johnson are on some sort of anti-car crusade. I’m guessing that cars don’t exist in the kind of urban utopia that they are failing miserably to bring to fruition.
As far as your statement what these cameras don’t take into account is what is happening around my car. When a livery cab decides to stop in the middle lane of 1st Avenue to drop off or pickup a fare, there is a truck in the left lane, and my only option is to swerve into a bus lane in order to not get into an accident the camera can’t take that into account. Or how about that scooter/electric bike people whizzing around that we have to avoid?
Speed traps around schools is one thing. Cameras for every infraction of the law is a money grab plain and simple.
Read your last line. Cameras for every "infraction of the law" you break the law you pay the price. I really dont get how hard this is for people. Don't break the law and you won't get a ticket or have to pay your so called "tax" . When those cameras stop making money and begin costing money then they will go away. Plain and simple ... well for some at least.
The truth is that the mayor and Corey Johnson are on some sort of anti-car crusade. I’m guessing that cars don’t exist in the kind of urban utopia that they are failing miserably to bring to fruition.
As far as your statement what these cameras don’t take into account is what is happening around my car. When a livery cab decides to stop in the middle lane of 1st Avenue to drop off or pickup a fare, there is a truck in the left lane, and my only option is to swerve into a bus lane in order to not get into an accident the camera can’t take that into account. Or how about that scooter/electric bike people whizzing around that we have to avoid?
Speed traps around schools is one thing. Cameras for every infraction of the law is a money grab plain and simple.
Read your last line. Cameras for every "infraction of the law" you break the law you pay the price. I really dont get how hard this is for people. Don't break the law and you won't get a ticket or have to pay your so called "tax" . When those cameras stop making money and begin costing money then they will go away. Plain and simple ... well for some at least.
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
D
>
The large majority of the red light camera violations are for people making a right turn on red without coming to a COMPLETE, WHEELS STOP ALL MOTION, stop.
I got a red light ticket after making a right turn on red. It was one of those intersections that had an illuminated sign saying "No Turn On Red" that goes out and allows a right turn on red depending on traffic. I made my right turn on red after the sign extinguished and got a ticket. I figured the system had malfunctioned. I went to court with photographs of the intersection and the video that was mailed to me. The video showed the sign extinguishing long before I made the turn. The judge said that wasn't the reason. In the video, you can see that my wheels never stopped turning. I was going at less of a speed as a 3 year old can peddle a tricycle. I got the ticket anyway. That is the rule.
That is where most of the income comes from. Not someone blowing through a red light and endangering the public. This was nothing to do with safety and only a $150 toll booth.
So let me see if I got this correct. You came to a red light didnt come to a COMPLETE STOP as you are supposed to and got a ticket. GUILTY. Not sure again where the problem is. Sure if it was a cop he likely wouldn't give you a ticket. But he could and would be right in doing so and you would still be guilty.
The large majority of the red light camera violations are for people making a right turn on red without coming to a COMPLETE, WHEELS STOP ALL MOTION, stop.
I got a red light ticket after making a right turn on red. It was one of those intersections that had an illuminated sign saying "No Turn On Red" that goes out and allows a right turn on red depending on traffic. I made my right turn on red after the sign extinguished and got a ticket. I figured the system had malfunctioned. I went to court with photographs of the intersection and the video that was mailed to me. The video showed the sign extinguishing long before I made the turn. The judge said that wasn't the reason. In the video, you can see that my wheels never stopped turning. I was going at less of a speed as a 3 year old can peddle a tricycle. I got the ticket anyway. That is the rule.
That is where most of the income comes from. Not someone blowing through a red light and endangering the public. This was nothing to do with safety and only a $150 toll booth.
So let me see if I got this correct. You came to a red light didnt come to a COMPLETE STOP as you are supposed to and got a ticket. GUILTY. Not sure again where the problem is. Sure if it was a cop he likely wouldn't give you a ticket. But he could and would be right in doing so and you would still be guilty.
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
D
Stopping distance at 30 mph is 45 feet.
First MateOriginal Crew693 postsSince 2019
Page 1 of 5
89 postsSign in to reply to this thread.