Snooooz...?
8,307 views·404 replies·by CELLFISH··
boring...we already know the beeetch broke the law and should be tossed out and locked up
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
So rediculous..... this guy told me that another person told him that someone heard a conversation that was told to my friend that someone choked out a cat. I think it was Shifty........ GUILTY!
What a HUGE waste of our Tax payers monies.
What a HUGE waste of our Tax payers monies.
CommodoreOriginal Crew16,165 postsSince 2018
>
So rediculous..... this guy told me that another person told him that someone heard a conversation that was told to my friend that someone choked out a cat. I think it was Shifty........ GUILTY!
What a HUGE waste of our Tax payers monies.
like 9 benghazi hearings??? lol!!! Unfortunately for the right wing this is not fabricated BS
So rediculous..... this guy told me that another person told him that someone heard a conversation that was told to my friend that someone choked out a cat. I think it was Shifty........ GUILTY!
What a HUGE waste of our Tax payers monies.
like 9 benghazi hearings??? lol!!! Unfortunately for the right wing this is not fabricated BS
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
>
like 9 benghazi hearings??? lol!!! Unfortunately for the right wing this is not fabricated BS
Your Killin me.......
Benghazi made me think of falafel or maybe a shish
like 9 benghazi hearings??? lol!!! Unfortunately for the right wing this is not fabricated BS
Your Killin me.......
Benghazi made me think of falafel or maybe a shish
CommodoreOriginal Crew16,165 postsSince 2018
does trump make you think of taking a big dump??? lol
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
>
Benghezi made me cringe. To defy an order to Stand Down was the only option or stand and die.
So who denied the repeated requests for more security, and who ran that dept? Bingo!!! "But She Broke No Laws". Must be Don's fault.
well it was the republicans repeated investigations and conclusions that she did not break any laws...and she testified for 10 hours unlike the POTUS who is being investigated who refuses any co-operation...not the actions of an innocent man
Benghezi made me cringe. To defy an order to Stand Down was the only option or stand and die.
So who denied the repeated requests for more security, and who ran that dept? Bingo!!! "But She Broke No Laws". Must be Don's fault.
well it was the republicans repeated investigations and conclusions that she did not break any laws...and she testified for 10 hours unlike the POTUS who is being investigated who refuses any co-operation...not the actions of an innocent man
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
due proc·ess
/d(y)o͞o prəˈses/
*noun*
[LIST=1]
[*]fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.]
This is not currently being followed by the Circus. This is a offense to you and me both.
Would you show to answer anything if you were given Due Process?
[/LIST]
/d(y)o͞o prəˈses/
*noun*
[LIST=1]
[*]fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.]
This is not currently being followed by the Circus. This is a offense to you and me both.
Would you show to answer anything if you were given Due Process?
[/LIST]
CommodoreOriginal Crew6,088 postsSince 2019
>
So rediculous..... this guy told me that another person told him that someone heard a conversation that was told to my friend that someone choked out a cat. I think it was Shifty........ GUILTY!
What a HUGE waste of our Tax payers monies.
[MEDIA=youtube]Y-SieCU11r4[/MEDIA]
So rediculous..... this guy told me that another person told him that someone heard a conversation that was told to my friend that someone choked out a cat. I think it was Shifty........ GUILTY!
What a HUGE waste of our Tax payers monies.
[MEDIA=youtube]Y-SieCU11r4[/MEDIA]
CommodoreOriginal Crew5,088 postsSince 2019
CommodoreOriginal Crew9,821 postsSince 2018
so the ambassador picked by trump and one of his key financial contributors says aid was withheld pending investigation into the Bidens....that ladies is QUID PRO QUO in case ya'll don't know the meaning!! So even those close to trump and his hand picked ambassador admits it now because they are afraid of perjury and going to jail like the rest of the trump circus.....but of course the TEA PARTY will carry on no matter what this criminal does as if it's ALL RIGHT!!! They are neanderthals who just cannot move forward and see what's in front of their face......but my audience is not them anyway...my audience is reasonable people who can truly pass judgement on what is clearly black and white and not believe the SPIN that is the GOP machine
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/13/bill-taylor-lays-out-how-he-understood-quid-pro-quo/
[SIZE=7]**Ambassador Taylor lays out how he understood the quid pro quo**[/SIZE]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/13/bill-taylor-lays-out-how-he-understood-quid-pro-quo/
[SIZE=7]**Ambassador Taylor lays out how he understood the quid pro quo**[/SIZE]
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
[SIZE=7]**The 2 quid pro quos at the heart of the impeachment inquiry**[/SIZE]
Here’s the timeline of what Trump officials asked the Ukrainians for.
[The 2 quid pro quos at the heart of the impeachment inquiry]("https://www.vox.com/2019/11/12/20954985/impeachment-trump-quid-pro-quo")
LOCK HIM UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here’s the timeline of what Trump officials asked the Ukrainians for.
[The 2 quid pro quos at the heart of the impeachment inquiry]("https://www.vox.com/2019/11/12/20954985/impeachment-trump-quid-pro-quo")
LOCK HIM UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
THE WORDS extortion and bribery CAN BE USED IN PLACE OF quid pro quo for our non Latin literates
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
*"There was a delay on sending hard-earned tax dollars of the American people to Ukraine," Jordan admitted. "We’re not talking any country, we’re talking Ukraine. Ernst & Young said one of the three most corrupt countries on the planet. … So our president said, 'Time out. Time out, let’s check out this new guy. Let’s see if Zelensky’s the real deal. This new guy who got elected in April, whose party took power in July. Let’s see if he’s legitimate.'"
Jordan continued, "Now, keep in mind, in 2018 President Trump had already done more for Ukraine than Obama did. That’s right, President Trump — who doesn’t like foreign aid, who wanted European countries to do more, who knew how corrupt Ukraine was — did more than Obama because he gave them Javelins, tank-busting Javelins to fight the Russians. Our witnesses have said this, others have said this: 'Obama gave them blankets, Trump gave them missiles.' But when it came time to check out this new guy, President Trump said, 'Let’s just see, let’s just see if he’s legit.'"
"So for 55 days, we checked him out. President Zelensky had five interactions with senior U.S. officials in that timeframe. One was, of course, the phone call, the July 25 phone call," the congressman explained.** "And there were four other face-to-face meetings with other senior U.S. officials. And guess what, in not one of those interactions — not one — were security assistance dollars linked to investigating Burisma or Biden."**
So what happened during those 55 days? "U.S. senators, Ambassador [John] Bolton, Vice President Pence, all became convinced that Zelensky was, in fact, worth the risk. He was, in fact, legit and the real deal and a real change. And guess what? They told the president, 'He’s a reformer, release the money.' And that’s exactly what President Trump did."
**Jordan's telling of events squared with the testimony of former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor, who admitted that there was "[no linkage]('https://pjmedia.com/trending/amb-taylor-admits-no-quid-pro-quo-in-his-3-meetings-with-zelensky-after-trump-call/')" of funding to Biden investigations in any of the three meetings he had with Zelensky during the time in question.
Jordan's version of events also makes sense considering the fact that Trump released the funding without Zelensky opening an investigation into Hunter Biden, Burisma, or alleged anti-Trump Ukraine meddling in the 2016 election.** **[SIZE=5]Yet Democrats will continue to push the quid pro quo "extortion" narrative, because it's politically convenient.[/SIZE]***
Jordan continued, "Now, keep in mind, in 2018 President Trump had already done more for Ukraine than Obama did. That’s right, President Trump — who doesn’t like foreign aid, who wanted European countries to do more, who knew how corrupt Ukraine was — did more than Obama because he gave them Javelins, tank-busting Javelins to fight the Russians. Our witnesses have said this, others have said this: 'Obama gave them blankets, Trump gave them missiles.' But when it came time to check out this new guy, President Trump said, 'Let’s just see, let’s just see if he’s legit.'"
"So for 55 days, we checked him out. President Zelensky had five interactions with senior U.S. officials in that timeframe. One was, of course, the phone call, the July 25 phone call," the congressman explained.** "And there were four other face-to-face meetings with other senior U.S. officials. And guess what, in not one of those interactions — not one — were security assistance dollars linked to investigating Burisma or Biden."**
So what happened during those 55 days? "U.S. senators, Ambassador [John] Bolton, Vice President Pence, all became convinced that Zelensky was, in fact, worth the risk. He was, in fact, legit and the real deal and a real change. And guess what? They told the president, 'He’s a reformer, release the money.' And that’s exactly what President Trump did."
**Jordan's telling of events squared with the testimony of former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor, who admitted that there was "[no linkage]('https://pjmedia.com/trending/amb-taylor-admits-no-quid-pro-quo-in-his-3-meetings-with-zelensky-after-trump-call/')" of funding to Biden investigations in any of the three meetings he had with Zelensky during the time in question.
Jordan's version of events also makes sense considering the fact that Trump released the funding without Zelensky opening an investigation into Hunter Biden, Burisma, or alleged anti-Trump Ukraine meddling in the 2016 election.** **[SIZE=5]Yet Democrats will continue to push the quid pro quo "extortion" narrative, because it's politically convenient.[/SIZE]***
CommodoreOriginal Crew9,821 postsSince 2018
where did you get that??? the FICTION section of your LIBRARY??
EDUCATE YOURSELF
[Gaetz misleads about Obama's record on Ukraine military aid]("https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2019/oct/25/matt-gaetz/matt-gaetz-says-obama-permanently-stopped-military/")
EDUCATE YOURSELF
[Gaetz misleads about Obama's record on Ukraine military aid]("https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2019/oct/25/matt-gaetz/matt-gaetz-says-obama-permanently-stopped-military/")
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said there was no blackmail involved during a telephone call with President Trump that has set in motion an impeachment inquiry - "CNBC"
Kind of hard to make something stick when there's no victim. "Teflon Don" (y)
Kind of hard to make something stick when there's no victim. "Teflon Don" (y)
CommodoreOriginal Crew6,088 postsSince 2019
[**[SIZE=6][FONT=times new roman]Impeachment Inquiry Canceled After 5 Episodes Due To Low Ratings [/FONT][/SIZE]**]('https://babylonbee.com/news/impeachment-inquiry-canceled-after-5-episodes-due-to-low-ratings')
**[SIZE=6][FONT=times new roman]:LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:[/FONT][/SIZE]**
**[SIZE=6][FONT=times new roman]:LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:[/FONT][/SIZE]**
CommodoreOriginal Crew9,821 postsSince 2018
Page 1 of 21
405 postsSign in to reply to this thread.