The proof is in the chair.
Chifty Chiff calls for a 5 minute break and it goes for an hour and a half. They come back 2hrs later picking their teeth from the free lunch we (the taxpayers appropriated) 38 million dollars later.
This is exactly what proves the mentality of these pricks and why they should be thrown overboard just like the cartons of tea in Dec 16th 1773.
Maybe they should be focused on HealthCare Reform.
dems obvious display of Taxpayers funds Abuse
774 views·35 replies·by JackPrintMD··
maybe we will have ten investigations like the gop had with Benghazi which led to NADDA!!
It is the job of congress to have hearings when a president commits crimes that could possibly be impeachable.....not doing it is negligent......it's quite obvious he wanted a foreign power to smear a political rival with DIRT and that folks is ILLEGAL not matter how much you worship DJT....BUT don't worry the gutless senate will bail him out
It is the job of congress to have hearings when a president commits crimes that could possibly be impeachable.....not doing it is negligent......it's quite obvious he wanted a foreign power to smear a political rival with DIRT and that folks is ILLEGAL not matter how much you worship DJT....BUT don't worry the gutless senate will bail him out
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
>
maybe we will have ten investigations like the gop had with Benghazi which led to NADDA!!
It is the job of congress to have hearings when a president commits crimes that could possibly be impeachable.....not doing it is negligent......it's quite obvious he wanted a foreign power to smear a political rival with DIRT and that folks is ILLEGAL not matter how much you worship DJT....BUT don't worry the gutless senate will bail him out
It’s quite obvious they have nothing. Complete waste of time and money. The Democratic Party is like a rudderless ship.
If it was so serious do you think they’d still be having the debates? I doubt it.
maybe we will have ten investigations like the gop had with Benghazi which led to NADDA!!
It is the job of congress to have hearings when a president commits crimes that could possibly be impeachable.....not doing it is negligent......it's quite obvious he wanted a foreign power to smear a political rival with DIRT and that folks is ILLEGAL not matter how much you worship DJT....BUT don't worry the gutless senate will bail him out
It’s quite obvious they have nothing. Complete waste of time and money. The Democratic Party is like a rudderless ship.
If it was so serious do you think they’d still be having the debates? I doubt it.
CommodoreOriginal Crew5,665 postsSince 2018
>
It’s quite obvious they have nothing. Complete waste of time and money. The Democratic Party is like a rudderless ship.
If it was so serious do you think they’d still be having the debates? I doubt it.
they must go thru proper channels and that includes hearings...numerous witnesses have testified he broke the law including a one million dollar contributor to TRUMP AND HIS AMBASSADOR.....So that is surely not NOTHING........But as trump said he could shoot someone on 5th ave and his supporters would deny it....it looks that way......so don't worry the senate will exonerate him of any crime and he can continue thumbing his nose at the law and most likely abuse it even more as this will embolden him.....but the taint of impeachment hopefully will taint him and the rest of the GOP in the next election......
The democrats are following the law....when the whistle blower reported this they are obligated to the American people to hold hearings and call witnesses....of whom there have been more than I expected....and they say the same thing....HE ABUSED THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY!!!! NO CHIT!!! LOL
It’s quite obvious they have nothing. Complete waste of time and money. The Democratic Party is like a rudderless ship.
If it was so serious do you think they’d still be having the debates? I doubt it.
they must go thru proper channels and that includes hearings...numerous witnesses have testified he broke the law including a one million dollar contributor to TRUMP AND HIS AMBASSADOR.....So that is surely not NOTHING........But as trump said he could shoot someone on 5th ave and his supporters would deny it....it looks that way......so don't worry the senate will exonerate him of any crime and he can continue thumbing his nose at the law and most likely abuse it even more as this will embolden him.....but the taint of impeachment hopefully will taint him and the rest of the GOP in the next election......
The democrats are following the law....when the whistle blower reported this they are obligated to the American people to hold hearings and call witnesses....of whom there have been more than I expected....and they say the same thing....HE ABUSED THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENCY!!!! NO CHIT!!! LOL
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
JUST TO ENLIGHTEN AND REFRESH UR MEMORIES READ THIS...NOT U CELLIE...TOO LONG
[SIZE=7]**Impeachment whine: Trump thinks Republicans weren't tough on Obama. Believe me, we were.**[/SIZE][SIZE=6]**What would Republicans have done to Barack Obama? Everything Democrats are doing to Trump and more. I know because I choreographed the GOP barrage.**[/SIZE]Kurt BardellaOpinion columnist
President Donald Trump started his Saturday morning routine with a tweet: “Can you imagine if these [Do Nothing Democrat Savages]('https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1177919923885969408'), people like Nadler, Schiff, AOC Plus 3, and many more, had a Republican Party who would have done to Obama what the Do Nothings are doing to me. Oh well, maybe next time!”
Setting aside the appalling use of the word “savages” to describe two Jewish members of Congress and a woman of color, the president’s “what if” scenario reveals how ignorant he is of some very recent history. This very decade opened with Republicans launching an investigatory barrage into the presidency of Barack Obama.
I know, because I was there choreographing it.
[SIZE=6]**An acute case of Trump amnesia?**[/SIZE]
From 2009 to 2013, I was the spokesperson and senior adviser for Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee under the leadership of Rep. Darrell Issa. During their time in the majority, the Oversight Committee alone [issued more than 100 subpoenas]('https://thehill.com/homenews/house/216470-subpoenas-under-rep-issa-top-100') to the Obama administration. Upon becoming chair of the committee, [Issa declared his intention]('https://www.politico.com/story/2010/11/issa-plans-hundreds-of-hearings-044850') to hold “seven hearings a week, times 40 weeks.”
In the spring of 2011, a [government whistleblower]('https://www.cnn.com/2013/08/27/world/americas/operation-fast-and-furious-fast-facts/index.html') prompted House and Senate Republicans to initiate an investigation into the “Operation Fast and Furious” gun-trafficking operation. The investigation lasted for more than [six years]('https://www.courthousenews.com/holder-slammed-gop-fast-furious-obstruction/') and included an Oversight Committee vote to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over what Republicans believed was an [abuse of executive privilege]('https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/attorney-general-eric-holder-sued-on-fast-and-furious/').
**Pelosi's impeachment wait paid off:**[Americans will turn on Donald Trump.]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/25/nancy-pelosi-donald-trump-impeachment-inquiry-bill-clinton-column/2438656001/')
I pointed to this quote from Rep. Jim Jordan [back in February]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/02/08/democrats-investigate-trump-truth-republican-hypocrisy-column/2800898002/') and it’s worth revisiting given the frequency with which Jordan now defends Trump. During Holder’s contempt proceeding, [Jordan pointedly asked]('https://www.c-span.org/video/?306660-1/contempt-proceedings-attorney-general-holder-part-1'), “How can you ignore the facts when you don’t get the facts? … I just want to get the information. … We just want the information so we have the facts.”
[IMG alt="President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama attend the inauguration on Jan. 20, 2017."]https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2019/09/29/USAT/7dc4b260-3690-4319-b333-fd8ed60a7f2c-XXX_20170120__APS_USA_148.JPG?width=660&height=441&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp[/IMG]
In case Trump is suffering from an acute attack of amnesia, he should be reminded that in the summer of 2012, House Republicans filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration in federal court over its use of executive privilege and ultimately won, with Judge Amy Berman Jackson [ruling that ]('https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2012cv1332-137')“Congress could seek to enforce its duly issued subpoena.”
For House Republicans, Fast and Furious was just act one of their oversight agenda. In the fall of 2012, Republicans launched what would turn out to be a [four-year investigation]('https://archives-benghazi-republicans-oversight.house.gov/NewInfo') into the attack on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. This is the investigation that would unearth then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s [use of a private email server]('https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/23/investigation-is-new-impeachment/'), a move that House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy [openly admitted]('https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kevin-mccarthys-truthful-gaffe/2015/09/30/f12a9fac-67a8-11e5-8325-a42b5a459b1e_story.html') was part of a “strategy to fight and win” the 2016 election.
[SIZE=6]**We didn't have corruption evidence**[/SIZE]
Just for context, the investigation conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller lasted for a little [less than two years]('https://time.com/5557332/mueller-report-length-special-counsels/'). While in control of Congress, House Republicans launched not one, not two but three multiyear investigations that each lasted longer than the Mueller probe. The third of these investigations was initiated in 2013 into the [IRS’ alleged targeting scandal]('http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/10/debunked-irs-scandal-shows-theres-no-sane-wing-of-the-gop.html'). It was eventually debunked as [baseless]('https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/liberal-groups-got-irs-scrutiny-too-inspector-general-finds/2017/10/04/e9b6e3c4-a929-11e7-850e-2bdd1236be5d_story.html'), with even the Trump administration declaring in 2017 that prosecuting the matter “would[ not be appropriate]('https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-doj-denies-gop-request-to-reopen-lois-lerner-case/') based on the available evidence.”
The reality is our committee never had anything close to the severity and volume of smoking gun evidence of corruption that exists right now, and we still managed to hold hundreds of oversight hearings, issue hundreds of subpoenas and conduct multiple multiyear investigations.
**How far does the misconduct go:**[Is Donald Trump's Justice Department part of the Ukraine scandal cover-up?]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/29/trump-ukraine-scandal-requires-criminal-investigation-column/3805023002/')
It was during this time that the standard for modern-day oversight was established, a standard that Republicans seemed all too willing to abandon the minute Donald Trump took office. As I noted [earlier this year]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/02/08/democrats-investigate-trump-truth-republican-hypocrisy-column/2800898002/'), it was when Obama was in office that the [Jim Jordans of the world declared]('https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4495462/resolution-hold-lois-lerner-contempt-congress') that “the only path to the truth" is through the House. It was during Obama's tenure that my former boss, Darrell Issa, said, “Our purpose has always been to get the information the committee needs to complete its work, that it is not only entitled to but obligated to do."
It was when Obama was president that the chair of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, Trey Gowdy, said, “The notion that you can withhold information and documents from Congress no matter whether you are the party in power or not in power is wrong. [Respect for the rule of law must mean something]('https://www.voanews.com/usa/obama-invokes-executive-privilege-congressional-investigation'), irrespective of the vicissitudes of political cycles."
So, if Donald Trump is wondering what Republicans would have done to Obama? The answer is, everything the Democrats are doing to him and more.
*Kurt Bardella, a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors and a former spokesperson and senior adviser for Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, joined the Democratic Party in 2017. Follow him on Twitter: [@kurtbardella]('https://twitter.com/kurtbardella')*
[]('https://www.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/opinion/2019/09/02/political-satire-humor-funny-trump/2191836001/')
[SIZE=7]**Impeachment whine: Trump thinks Republicans weren't tough on Obama. Believe me, we were.**[/SIZE][SIZE=6]**What would Republicans have done to Barack Obama? Everything Democrats are doing to Trump and more. I know because I choreographed the GOP barrage.**[/SIZE]Kurt BardellaOpinion columnist
President Donald Trump started his Saturday morning routine with a tweet: “Can you imagine if these [Do Nothing Democrat Savages]('https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1177919923885969408'), people like Nadler, Schiff, AOC Plus 3, and many more, had a Republican Party who would have done to Obama what the Do Nothings are doing to me. Oh well, maybe next time!”
Setting aside the appalling use of the word “savages” to describe two Jewish members of Congress and a woman of color, the president’s “what if” scenario reveals how ignorant he is of some very recent history. This very decade opened with Republicans launching an investigatory barrage into the presidency of Barack Obama.
I know, because I was there choreographing it.
[SIZE=6]**An acute case of Trump amnesia?**[/SIZE]
From 2009 to 2013, I was the spokesperson and senior adviser for Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee under the leadership of Rep. Darrell Issa. During their time in the majority, the Oversight Committee alone [issued more than 100 subpoenas]('https://thehill.com/homenews/house/216470-subpoenas-under-rep-issa-top-100') to the Obama administration. Upon becoming chair of the committee, [Issa declared his intention]('https://www.politico.com/story/2010/11/issa-plans-hundreds-of-hearings-044850') to hold “seven hearings a week, times 40 weeks.”
In the spring of 2011, a [government whistleblower]('https://www.cnn.com/2013/08/27/world/americas/operation-fast-and-furious-fast-facts/index.html') prompted House and Senate Republicans to initiate an investigation into the “Operation Fast and Furious” gun-trafficking operation. The investigation lasted for more than [six years]('https://www.courthousenews.com/holder-slammed-gop-fast-furious-obstruction/') and included an Oversight Committee vote to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over what Republicans believed was an [abuse of executive privilege]('https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/attorney-general-eric-holder-sued-on-fast-and-furious/').
**Pelosi's impeachment wait paid off:**[Americans will turn on Donald Trump.]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/25/nancy-pelosi-donald-trump-impeachment-inquiry-bill-clinton-column/2438656001/')
I pointed to this quote from Rep. Jim Jordan [back in February]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/02/08/democrats-investigate-trump-truth-republican-hypocrisy-column/2800898002/') and it’s worth revisiting given the frequency with which Jordan now defends Trump. During Holder’s contempt proceeding, [Jordan pointedly asked]('https://www.c-span.org/video/?306660-1/contempt-proceedings-attorney-general-holder-part-1'), “How can you ignore the facts when you don’t get the facts? … I just want to get the information. … We just want the information so we have the facts.”
[IMG alt="President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama attend the inauguration on Jan. 20, 2017."]https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2019/09/29/USAT/7dc4b260-3690-4319-b333-fd8ed60a7f2c-XXX_20170120__APS_USA_148.JPG?width=660&height=441&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp[/IMG]
In case Trump is suffering from an acute attack of amnesia, he should be reminded that in the summer of 2012, House Republicans filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration in federal court over its use of executive privilege and ultimately won, with Judge Amy Berman Jackson [ruling that ]('https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2012cv1332-137')“Congress could seek to enforce its duly issued subpoena.”
For House Republicans, Fast and Furious was just act one of their oversight agenda. In the fall of 2012, Republicans launched what would turn out to be a [four-year investigation]('https://archives-benghazi-republicans-oversight.house.gov/NewInfo') into the attack on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. This is the investigation that would unearth then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s [use of a private email server]('https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/23/investigation-is-new-impeachment/'), a move that House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy [openly admitted]('https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/kevin-mccarthys-truthful-gaffe/2015/09/30/f12a9fac-67a8-11e5-8325-a42b5a459b1e_story.html') was part of a “strategy to fight and win” the 2016 election.
[SIZE=6]**We didn't have corruption evidence**[/SIZE]
Just for context, the investigation conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller lasted for a little [less than two years]('https://time.com/5557332/mueller-report-length-special-counsels/'). While in control of Congress, House Republicans launched not one, not two but three multiyear investigations that each lasted longer than the Mueller probe. The third of these investigations was initiated in 2013 into the [IRS’ alleged targeting scandal]('http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/10/debunked-irs-scandal-shows-theres-no-sane-wing-of-the-gop.html'). It was eventually debunked as [baseless]('https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/liberal-groups-got-irs-scrutiny-too-inspector-general-finds/2017/10/04/e9b6e3c4-a929-11e7-850e-2bdd1236be5d_story.html'), with even the Trump administration declaring in 2017 that prosecuting the matter “would[ not be appropriate]('https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trumps-doj-denies-gop-request-to-reopen-lois-lerner-case/') based on the available evidence.”
The reality is our committee never had anything close to the severity and volume of smoking gun evidence of corruption that exists right now, and we still managed to hold hundreds of oversight hearings, issue hundreds of subpoenas and conduct multiple multiyear investigations.
**How far does the misconduct go:**[Is Donald Trump's Justice Department part of the Ukraine scandal cover-up?]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/29/trump-ukraine-scandal-requires-criminal-investigation-column/3805023002/')
It was during this time that the standard for modern-day oversight was established, a standard that Republicans seemed all too willing to abandon the minute Donald Trump took office. As I noted [earlier this year]('https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/02/08/democrats-investigate-trump-truth-republican-hypocrisy-column/2800898002/'), it was when Obama was in office that the [Jim Jordans of the world declared]('https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4495462/resolution-hold-lois-lerner-contempt-congress') that “the only path to the truth" is through the House. It was during Obama's tenure that my former boss, Darrell Issa, said, “Our purpose has always been to get the information the committee needs to complete its work, that it is not only entitled to but obligated to do."
It was when Obama was president that the chair of the House Select Committee on Benghazi, Trey Gowdy, said, “The notion that you can withhold information and documents from Congress no matter whether you are the party in power or not in power is wrong. [Respect for the rule of law must mean something]('https://www.voanews.com/usa/obama-invokes-executive-privilege-congressional-investigation'), irrespective of the vicissitudes of political cycles."
So, if Donald Trump is wondering what Republicans would have done to Obama? The answer is, everything the Democrats are doing to him and more.
*Kurt Bardella, a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors and a former spokesperson and senior adviser for Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, joined the Democratic Party in 2017. Follow him on Twitter: [@kurtbardella]('https://twitter.com/kurtbardella')*
[]('https://www.usatoday.com/picture-gallery/opinion/2019/09/02/political-satire-humor-funny-trump/2191836001/')
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
Keep quoting all of your “references” because it is a useless waste of time.
Guilty until proven innocent. Works for dems versus conservatives. When it’s vice versa they’re all up in arms.
There’s no evidence. Second, third, and fourth hand accounts only. Every news outlet in the world admitted that yesterday.
If I only were given $5 for every:
“I believe” “I hope” “I heard from...” “I think”
It’s pathetic really.
Guilty until proven innocent. Works for dems versus conservatives. When it’s vice versa they’re all up in arms.
There’s no evidence. Second, third, and fourth hand accounts only. Every news outlet in the world admitted that yesterday.
If I only were given $5 for every:
“I believe” “I hope” “I heard from...” “I think”
It’s pathetic really.
CommodoreOriginal Crew5,665 postsSince 2018
>
Keep quoting all of your “references” because it is a useless waste of time.
Guilty until proven innocent. Works for dems versus conservatives. When it’s vice versa they’re all up in arms.
There’s no evidence. Second, third, and fourth hand accounts only. Every news outlet in the world admitted that yesterday.
If I only were given $5 for every:
“I believe” “I hope” “I heard from...” “I think”
It’s pathetic really.
there is plenty of evidence but you only want to see what fits your agenda.......go ahead drink the kool aid...they didn't make it for nothing ya know (y)
Keep quoting all of your “references” because it is a useless waste of time.
Guilty until proven innocent. Works for dems versus conservatives. When it’s vice versa they’re all up in arms.
There’s no evidence. Second, third, and fourth hand accounts only. Every news outlet in the world admitted that yesterday.
If I only were given $5 for every:
“I believe” “I hope” “I heard from...” “I think”
It’s pathetic really.
there is plenty of evidence but you only want to see what fits your agenda.......go ahead drink the kool aid...they didn't make it for nothing ya know (y)
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
If and when this Hunter guy ever runs for office we can check him out....right now we have a president abusing his power with bribery and extortion....stay focused ladies + gents lol
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
[**[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]A new poll shows support for the impeachment of President Trump has declined since public hearings have started.[/COLOR]**
[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]****[/COLOR]
**[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]The Emerson poll released Thursday found support for impeachment has dropped from 48% to 43% since October, while opposition to impeachment has risen from 44% to 45%.[/COLOR]**]('https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/november-national-poll-support-for-impeachment-declines-biden-and-sanders-lead-democratic-primary')
[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]****[/COLOR]
**[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]The Emerson poll released Thursday found support for impeachment has dropped from 48% to 43% since October, while opposition to impeachment has risen from 44% to 45%.[/COLOR]**]('https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/november-national-poll-support-for-impeachment-declines-biden-and-sanders-lead-democratic-primary')
CommodoreOriginal Crew9,821 postsSince 2018
>
Keep quoting all of your “references” because it is a useless waste of time.
Guilty until proven innocent. Works for dems versus conservatives. When it’s vice versa they’re all up in arms.
There’s no evidence. Second, third, and fourth hand accounts only. Every news outlet in the world admitted that yesterday.
If I only were given $5 for every:
“I believe” “I hope” “I heard from...” “I think”
It’s pathetic really.
this is pretty damn direct eh? lol [SIZE=7] Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor whoops!!! rut-roh!![/SIZE]
[SIZE=6]**It was no secret’: Sondland says Trump ordered Ukraine pressure campaign**[/SIZE]
"Was there a 'quid pro quo?’" he said. "The answer is yes."
[IMG alt="Gordon Sondland "]https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/0d6a3f7/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F71%2F9e%2Fd61586754045978140aa37572f6b%2F191120-gordon-sondland-gty-773.jpg[/IMG]
Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images
By [ANDREW DESIDERIO]('https://www.politico.com/staff/andrew-desiderio') and [KYLE CHENEY]('https://www.politico.com/staff/kyle-cheney')
11/20/2019 05:16 AM EST
Updated: 11/20/2019 06:31 PM EST
President Donald Trump’s top Europe envoy Gordon Sondland told House impeachment investigators Wednesday that Trump conditioned a valuable White House meeting for Ukraine's new president on his willingness to launch investigations into Trump’s Democratic adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.
“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”
Story Continued Below
Keep quoting all of your “references” because it is a useless waste of time.
Guilty until proven innocent. Works for dems versus conservatives. When it’s vice versa they’re all up in arms.
There’s no evidence. Second, third, and fourth hand accounts only. Every news outlet in the world admitted that yesterday.
If I only were given $5 for every:
“I believe” “I hope” “I heard from...” “I think”
It’s pathetic really.
this is pretty damn direct eh? lol [SIZE=7] Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor whoops!!! rut-roh!![/SIZE]
[SIZE=6]**It was no secret’: Sondland says Trump ordered Ukraine pressure campaign**[/SIZE]
"Was there a 'quid pro quo?’" he said. "The answer is yes."
[IMG alt="Gordon Sondland "]https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/0d6a3f7/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F71%2F9e%2Fd61586754045978140aa37572f6b%2F191120-gordon-sondland-gty-773.jpg[/IMG]
Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images
By [ANDREW DESIDERIO]('https://www.politico.com/staff/andrew-desiderio') and [KYLE CHENEY]('https://www.politico.com/staff/kyle-cheney')
11/20/2019 05:16 AM EST
Updated: 11/20/2019 06:31 PM EST
President Donald Trump’s top Europe envoy Gordon Sondland told House impeachment investigators Wednesday that Trump conditioned a valuable White House meeting for Ukraine's new president on his willingness to launch investigations into Trump’s Democratic adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.
“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”
Story Continued Below
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
>
[**[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]A new poll shows support for the impeachment of President Trump has declined since public hearings have started.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]The Emerson poll released Thursday found support for impeachment has dropped from 48% to 43% since October, while opposition to impeachment has risen from 44% to 45%.[/COLOR]**]('https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/november-national-poll-support-for-impeachment-declines-biden-and-sanders-lead-democratic-primary')
funny how you guys LIKE polls in the favor of the tea party mind set eh? lol
[**[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]A new poll shows support for the impeachment of President Trump has declined since public hearings have started.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]The Emerson poll released Thursday found support for impeachment has dropped from 48% to 43% since October, while opposition to impeachment has risen from 44% to 45%.[/COLOR]**]('https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/november-national-poll-support-for-impeachment-declines-biden-and-sanders-lead-democratic-primary')
funny how you guys LIKE polls in the favor of the tea party mind set eh? lol
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
SONDLAND first denied everything but then knew he could go to jail for perjury and fessed up......everyone who touches trump goes to jail.....SONDLAND SAID no friggin way....so he told the truth....he has no agenda and is a trump and gop supporter .....
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
>
maybe we will have ten investigations like the gop had with Benghazi which led to NADDA!!
It is the job of congress to have hearings when a president commits crimes that could possibly be impeachable.....not doing it is negligent......it's quite obvious he wanted a foreign power to smear a political rival with DIRT and that folks is ILLEGAL not matter how much you worship DJT....BUT don't worry the gutless senate will bail him out
LoL it proved to keep Hillary out of da White House... cellie... ?
maybe we will have ten investigations like the gop had with Benghazi which led to NADDA!!
It is the job of congress to have hearings when a president commits crimes that could possibly be impeachable.....not doing it is negligent......it's quite obvious he wanted a foreign power to smear a political rival with DIRT and that folks is ILLEGAL not matter how much you worship DJT....BUT don't worry the gutless senate will bail him out
LoL it proved to keep Hillary out of da White House... cellie... ?
CommodoreOriginal Crew18,289 postsSince 2019
>
this is pretty damn direct eh? lol [SIZE=7] Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor whoops!!! rut-roh!![/SIZE]
[SIZE=6]**It was no secret’: Sondland says Trump ordered Ukraine pressure campaign**[/SIZE]
"Was there a 'quid pro quo?’" he said. "The answer is yes."
[IMG alt="Gordon Sondland "]https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/0d6a3f7/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F71%2F9e%2Fd61586754045978140aa37572f6b%2F191120-gordon-sondland-gty-773.jpg[/IMG]
Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images
By [ANDREW DESIDERIO]('https://www.politico.com/staff/andrew-desiderio') and [KYLE CHENEY]('https://www.politico.com/staff/kyle-cheney')
11/20/2019 05:16 AM EST
Updated: 11/20/2019 06:31 PM EST
President Donald Trump’s top Europe envoy Gordon Sondland told House impeachment investigators Wednesday that Trump conditioned a valuable White House meeting for Ukraine's new president on his willingness to launch investigations into Trump’s Democratic adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.
“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”
Story Continued Below
Lol. Yeah sure.
this is pretty damn direct eh? lol [SIZE=7] Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor whoops!!! rut-roh!![/SIZE]
[SIZE=6]**It was no secret’: Sondland says Trump ordered Ukraine pressure campaign**[/SIZE]
"Was there a 'quid pro quo?’" he said. "The answer is yes."
[IMG alt="Gordon Sondland "]https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/0d6a3f7/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F71%2F9e%2Fd61586754045978140aa37572f6b%2F191120-gordon-sondland-gty-773.jpg[/IMG]
Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland. | Drew Angerer/Getty Images
By [ANDREW DESIDERIO]('https://www.politico.com/staff/andrew-desiderio') and [KYLE CHENEY]('https://www.politico.com/staff/kyle-cheney')
11/20/2019 05:16 AM EST
Updated: 11/20/2019 06:31 PM EST
President Donald Trump’s top Europe envoy Gordon Sondland told House impeachment investigators Wednesday that Trump conditioned a valuable White House meeting for Ukraine's new president on his willingness to launch investigations into Trump’s Democratic adversaries, including former Vice President Joe Biden.
“Was there a ‘quid pro quo?’” Sondland — a close Trump ally and longtime GOP donor — said in his opening remarks to the House Intelligence Committee. “The answer is yes.”
Story Continued Below
Lol. Yeah sure.
CommodoreOriginal Crew5,665 postsSince 2018
very well thought out response...one that you use often.....what does it mean?
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
when you remove ur head from your anus
what part of with holding 400 million in aid unless a "favor" is granted is difficult for you to grasp anyway?? The ambassador knew he was doing this so why would he not presume that is a quid pro quo...you guys just spin crap
what part of with holding 400 million in aid unless a "favor" is granted is difficult for you to grasp anyway?? The ambassador knew he was doing this so why would he not presume that is a quid pro quo...you guys just spin crap
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
[SIZE=7]**WATCH: Was there a 'quid pro quo'? 'The answer is yes,' Sondland says...what part you don't KAPEESH??**[/SIZE]
[MEDIA=youtube]eBh0oJFtV_c[/MEDIA]
[MEDIA=youtube]eBh0oJFtV_c[/MEDIA]
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
FOR ANYONE TO THINK that the president did not do these things or is somehow above these things after seeing the nature of this beast and seeing his inner circle get convicted well that's just mental retardation and they should seek help and fast!! Same people screaming Benghazi (a big nothing after ten investigations) are now cry babies because trump got busted committing a real crime
CommodoreOriginal Crew12,530 postsSince 2018
Page 1 of 2
36 postsSign in to reply to this thread.