STOP LMFAO the vaccine does not stop you from getting Covid and spreading it you dont seem to get that its not a TRUE VACCINE
Your circle of friends come up with that one?
Does the Covid vaccine stimulate an immune response? Yes or no?
Na its common knowledge the vaccine/shots wont stop you from getting/spreading Covid you dont seem to get that
Na its common knowledge the vaccine/shots wont stop you from getting/spreading Covid you dont seem to get that
Yes that may be true but it does help you from getting hit hard and ending up in the hospital or a coffin
Still waiting to find out what the circle of friends defines as a TRUE VACCINE.............ought to be good. Bereft with supporting data ?
Damm you dont get it huh LMAO
You made a FALSE statement and you didn't answer my question.
Once again, Does it stimulate an immune response??? Yes or No?
False statement how? the shots wont stop you from getting Covid,,,
You made a FALSE statement and you didn't answer my question.
Once again, Does it stimulate an immune response??? Yes or No?
Jumping in here:
You have gone on record as stating that the vax doesn't prevent you from getting covid nor transmitting it to others. Cany simply stated the FACTS, that you yourself espoused numerous times on this site.
NOW... you accuse him of making a FALSE statement, and then conveniently flip the narrative to ask 'does the vax causes an immune response". WTF is that about?
Well that is obvious Sherlock....of-course it causes an immune response. The better questions is "how much" . Antibody Dependent Enhancement.
And to back up my least sentence......read here from the NE Journal Of Medicine.
[URL unfurl="true"]https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/a-frightening-new-potential-explanation[/URL]
Jumping in here:
You have gone on record as stating that the vax doesn't prevent you from getting covid nor transmitting it to others. Cany simply stated the FACTS, that you yourself espoused numerous times on this site.
NOW... you accuse him of making a FALSE statement, and then conveniently flip the narrative to ask 'does the vax causes an immune response". WTF is that about?
Well that is obvious Sherlock....of-course it causes an immune response. The better questions is "how much" . Antibody Dependent Enhancement.
Hes at a loss like most about the shots saving their lives
Hes at a loss like most about the shots saving their lives
so you are saying the shots save lives?
Where have you been? Entennmanns is made in PA now and sold nationwide. It’s crap!
Not 30 years ago when I started doing it…
Not a TRUE vaccine........False statement.
You just make chit up as you go along like the rest of your cohorts trying to justify not getting vaxxed when it's been proven effective HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of times over!
Funny (or not)..... It's the deaf defending the blind!
Depends on what side you stand on.You’re not immune with the current term so they changed the meaning to fit the sheep agenda. So not true as a vaccine unless you conform to the new woke meaning. I added a random link for the fact checkers.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html
In addition to the relationship of those with a higher education being more likely to get the vaccination……….. I think there is also a relationship with the amount of teeth you have in your head, and getting the vaccination. Most people with few to no teeth are anti-vax. Most with all there teeth, be they implants or such, are pro-vax.
Now, there is also a relationship between people with no teeth in their head, and having a education of approx. grade 4-5.
So my question, being both of these groups are anti-vax, is it having the dental issues, or lack of education that most contributes to their anti-vax position, or it a combination of the two?
I've dipped into this before, but using a publicly dumbed-down definition of vaccine from fifty years ago to justify your opposition to new technology is a piss-poor argument. I guess we can never come up with a different concept because the CDC set it in stone in 1954 with the best knowledge they had AT THE TIME.
Reminds me of a discussion on another forum about natural immunity where the poster explains that when he had chicken pox in nineteenseventywhatever all the moms sent their kids to play with him so they could acquire "natural immunity"
I wonder how many of them are sueing their moms today when they have a shingles outbreak.
But of course you both rely on the internet for your information
and what's your point?
How do you get your information? From stone tablets delivered in a pillar of fire?
:rolleyes:
If the changing of the definition of a vaccine has got your panties in a knot, let me help you out. There is NOT a 100%, fool-proof vaccine out there, and never has been. Therefore EVERY vaccine ever made, or is in use today, never fit that old "IMMUNITY" specification.
Find something else to get worked up about, I'm sure there are a few thousand "lost" ballots you can go hunting for...
In addition to the relationship of those with a higher education being more likely to get the vaccination……….. I think there is also a relationship with the amount of teeth you have in your head, and getting the vaccination. Most people with few to no teeth are anti-vax. Most with all there teeth, be they implants or such, are pro-vax.
Now, there is also a relationship between people with no teeth in their head, and having a education of approx. grade 4-5.
So my question, being both of these groups are anti-vax, is it having the dental issues, or lack of education that most contributes to their anti-vax position, or it a combination of the two?
Holy crap your all still going
On about this
You all need to move to florida
It’s barely a blip here anymore
He's baaaaack! Lol
See what you missed? We ran out of things to fight about so now it's about word definitions. Can't make this chit up!
Sign in to reply to this thread.
