it was intentional… period…
.
it was intentional… period…
.
Well China was hit the hardest so I don't see that....just a eff up most likely
No way!
[URL unfurl="true"]https://nypost.com/2023/02/26/chinese-lab-leak-likely-behind-covid-19-outbreak/[/URL]
That’s right and guess who will take partial responsibility as not only did he fund it, he was guiding the research ???. Nerds saying we had Tin Foil Hats are quiet now ?. They’ll be selling pieces of him in sealed test tubes on line. Enjoy the decline.
Yellow Eyed Devils.
Yak Pack.
Gullible… if it wasn’t leaked, would’ve been brought over in a balloon ?… hahaha…
cellie...stay outta the sun....
It's been theorized since day 1 that it came from China....this is new?
and as I have stated repeatedly, The Wuhan Bacteriological Warfare Lab is located "near" the alleged origin. Do not trust the chinese. Ever.
You've constantly talked about a purposeful release, and often boast about reading "The Art of War". Please cite the passage in that book where it's a good idea to launch an attack with something that would probably hurt your forces as much, if not more than the enemy's. I know I can't find it.
Accidental release, possibly. Planned release - maybe for the Keystone Kops, but not for a methodical and careful planning organization like the PRC.
Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
You've constantly talked about a purposeful release, and often boast about reading "The Art of War". Please cite the passage in that book where it's a good idea to launch an attack with something that would probably hurt your forces as much, if not more than the enemy's. I know I can't find it.
Accidental release, possibly. Planned release - maybe for the Keystone Kops, but not for a methodical and careful planning organization like the PRC.
it's like saying the Chinese will release radiation over the U.S.A. by dropping an ATOMIC bomb on PEKING...or whatever they call it these days
h
Sincerely hope you are both right. I will simply never trust the chinese commies. Ever
hey Pequa, guess Chinese takeout ? is off limits too… cellie…
... sand under my bare feet is better than subway steps with steel toe boots on... cellfish...
.
it was INTENTIONAL, thanks Dr. Li Yang
.
[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan[/URL]
... sand under my bare feet is better than subway steps with steel toe boots on... cellfish...
.
it was INTENTIONAL, thanks Dr. Li Yang
.
[URL unfurl="true"]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan[/URL]
Maybe the creation, but not the release...
And just for you edification, a "Pre-print" isn't anything published nor anything of intellectual validity. You too can write a "Pre-print" on cold fusion and see it mentioned in a Wikipedia article. I bet you can find references to the clinical benefits of Ivermectin there too.
Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
maybe.?… hahaha
Yeah, maybe. Even the Wikipedia citation you so astutely provided says nobody believes her. Hell the the scientific evidence she presented were considered by reviewers "as not demonstrating 'sufficient scientific evidence to support [their] claims'".
Regardless, the point me and MTB were making that there's no way a release was planned because the Chinese are far too methodical and planning to inflict significant damage to their economy, population and world stature by releasing it in their own country...
***In April 2020, she fled to the United States. She co-authored several [preprint]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preprint') research papers[[a]]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan#cite_note-10') claiming that SARS-CoV-2 was "produced in a laboratory."[[9]]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan#cite_note-nationalgeographic-9')[[10]]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan#cite_note-gqqmx-11')[[11]]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan#cite_note-Graham2020immunity-12') According to scientific reviewers from the [Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johns_Hopkins_Center_for_Health_Security'), Yan's paper offered "contradictory and inaccurate information that does not support their argument,"[[4]]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan#cite_note-JHCHS_Warmbrod_20200921-4') while reviewers from [[I]Rapid Reviews: COVID-19*]('https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapid_Reviews:_COVID-19') criticised her preprints as not demonstrating "sufficient scientific evidence to support [their] claims**[/I]
Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
Sign in to reply to this thread.