Coronavirus

One good meme, deserves another... If you look at the eOED for the definition of Cockwomble this picture pops up

There's a difference between lying and using the best available information AT THAT TIME that later turns out to be false.

One good meme, deserves another... If you look at the eOED for the definition of Cockwomble this picture pops up

That's not TOO political........

ahhh, British slang.

That's not TOO political........

If you could only see his tears.

There's a difference between lying and using the best available information AT THAT TIME that later turns out to be false.

How about having no fucking clue ?. Don’t ever forget this man believed HIV was spread by children.

The only thing your clip shows is you need to get off the sauce because YOU have no f&king clue!

The only thing your clip shows is you need to get off the sauce because YOU have no f&king clue!

You wore a mask ?. You got how many shots?. Fauci said they are safe?. Myocarditis is now a thing in sports ? and still you worship the Fauci. ?

[MEDIA=youtube]95MgYyAbDwk[/MEDIA]

Ditto..... lol

Ditto..... lol

Oh look, he was right all along. ? about all of it.

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.factcheck.org/2022/02/scicheck-scientist-misleads-on-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-and-vaccine-safety-for-children/[/URL]

I'm guessing reading comprehension is not your strong suit.

Malone has too much baggage to list here....,.

Listen I know it’s hard to get screwed over so bad and to want to take it out on those you thought we’re just not on that comprehension pedestal you put your self on. You all got scammed. I get it, it hurts. I can feel the burn all the way over here.

I have extra tinfoil hats for the next plandemic if you want.

We need more scams like that!! lol

[HEADING=2]COVID-19 vaccines have saved 20 million lives so far, study estimates[/HEADING]
Deaths from COVID-19 were two-thirds lower than they otherwise could have been during the first year of the vaccination program, mathematical modelling suggests.

[HEADING=2]What is the research about?[/HEADING]
Just under a year after COVID-19 was identified, the first vaccines were being delivered into patients’ arms – the start of a worldwide vaccination campaign that continues today. This unprecedented global effort to develop and produce vaccines was accompanied by the COVAX initiative, which sought to guarantee equitable delivery to low-income countries. This study aimed to estimate the impact of the global COVID-19 vaccination programme during its first year.

[HEADING=1]COVID-19 vaccines have saved millions of lives, and rapid, widespread access to them made a difference; one notable finding is that high-income countries had more lives saved per vaccine because people had access to them sooner.[/HEADING]

[HEADING=2]What did the researchers do?[/HEADING]
Researchers at Imperial College London’s MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis used country-level estimates of COVID-19 deaths that occurred between 8 December 2020 and 8 December 2021 to compare COVID-19 mortality in countries where vaccines were available, versus those where no vaccines had been delivered during that period. For countries lacking robust surveillance systems, they used a proxy indicator of the number of excess deaths recorded above the expected level.

[HEADING=2]What did they find?[/HEADING]
They found that 19.8 million COVID-19 deaths were prevented in 185 countries during the first year of COVID-19 vaccinations – 63% lower than the number could have been without vaccination.

However, they calculated that that reduction could have been even higher if the World Health Organization (WHO) target of vaccinating 40% of each country’s population by the end of 2021 had been reached – equivalent to additional 599,300 lives saved.

Meeting the COVAX target of 20% coverage in the 92 low- and middle-income countries it supports by the end of 2021 could have prevented an extra 81,750 deaths – although this target was in fact met in January 2022, shortly after the study period ended, so it’s possible that lives saved were not accounted for in the researchers’ calculations.

Listen I know it’s hard to get screwed over so bad and to want to take it out on those you thought we’re just not on that comprehension pedestal you put your self on. You all got scammed. I get it, it hurts. I can feel the burn all the way over here.

I have extra tinfoil hats for the next plandemic if you want.

Wrap some of the fish you don't catch in your tinfoil and bake it.

I read multiple papers that were published after the 2003 SARS outbreak, warning that the world needed to be prepared for another similar virus, and there were many groups examining and this potential. A major US pandemic preparedness effort in 2017 concluded that we were adequately prepared, so yes scientists involved predicted that another one would happen.

Here's one fact check on your blurb... [VERIFY: In 2017 Fauci said Trump would face a surprise outbreak, but he didn't predict COVID-19]('https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/verify-fauci-said-trump-would-face-surprise-outbreak-didnt-predict-covid-19/65-b5ac71a8-b0d7-458e-af82-acedbf8c6f61')

Author: Eliana Block
Published: 5:32 PM EDT May 19, 2020
Updated: 11:28 PM EDT May 19, 2020
[[IMG alt="Facebook"]https://www.wusa9.com/assets/shared-images/icons/facebook.svg[/IMG]]('https://www.facebook.com/dialog/share?app_id=143217143049026&display=popup&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wusa9.com%2Farticle%2Fnews%2Fverify%2Fverify-fauci-said-trump-would-face-surprise-outbreak-didnt-predict-covid-19%2F65-b5ac71a8-b0d7-458e-af82-acedbf8c6f61&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wusa9.com%2Farticle%2Fnews%2Fverify%2Fverify-fauci-said-trump-would-face-surprise-outbreak-didnt-predict-covid-19%2F65-b5ac71a8-b0d7-458e-af82-acedbf8c6f61')[[IMG alt="Twitter"]https://www.wusa9.com/assets/shared-images/icons/twitter.svg[/IMG]]('https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=VERIFY%3A%20In%202017%20Fauci%20said%20Trump%20would%20face%20a%20surprise%20outbreak%2C%20but%20he%20didn%27t%20predict%20COVID-19&url=https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/verify-fauci-said-trump-would-face-surprise-outbreak-didnt-predict-covid-19/65-b5ac71a8-b0d7-458e-af82-acedbf8c6f61&via=WUSA9')
WASHINGTON D.C., DC — QUESTION:
Did Dr. Fauci say back in January 2017 that the incoming Trump administration would face a surprise disease outbreak?
ANSWER:
Yes. However, he was generally discussing what presidents face while in office, while speaking at a forum about pandemic preparedness. Fauci did not predict the COVID-19 pandemic.

Oh and the Time Cover Story in May, 2017 talked about a new pandemic. Never knew Dr. Fauci was an editor there...

May 15th, 2017 | Vol. 189, No. 18 | U.S.