So you're catching a few hundred (300) fish in 4 hours? That means you're boating a fish every 75 seconds (300/4x60)*60), and that doesn't include time for unhooking, measuring, tagging, rerigging, if needed, and casting.
You must be quite efficient in your fishing, or really full of it.
I guess you've learned from the best how to tell a tale...
[SIZE=5]Don’t know why you think that’s a lot. Crap it’s typical to catch a few hundred in Salem Mass below you[/SIZE][SIZE=7] in a few days[/SIZE] if you time the arrival right and[SIZE=5]** that’s only going out about four hours a day
I read that as 300 fish over a few days at 4 hours fishing time each day. **[/SIZE]
OK, let's redo the math to 100 fish a day in 4 hours, which means 25 fish an hour, so that's 2.4 minutes per fish, without all the other caveats. Heck, when I catch one over the slot fish, I spend at least 3-4 minutes between unhooking and reviving it to the point it can swim away on its own.
Still, hyperbole...
Shall I go to heaven or a-fishing? - H. D. Thoreau Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
[SIZE=5]Don’t know why you think that’s a lot. Crap it’s typical to catch a few hundred in Salem Mass below you[/SIZE][SIZE=7] in a few days[/SIZE] if you time the arrival right and[SIZE=5]** that’s only going out about four hours a day
I read that as 300 fish over a few days at 4 hours fishing time each day. **[/SIZE]
I guess the key phrase was 300 fish OVER A FEW DAYS
So you're catching a few hundred (300) fish in 4 hours? That means you're boating a fish every 75 seconds (300/4x60)*60), and that doesn't include time for unhooking, measuring, tagging, rerigging, if needed, and casting.
You must be quite efficient in your fishing, or really full of it.
I guess you've learned from the best how to tell a tale...
all fisherman are LIARS....Add in maga and you got PINNOCHIO ON STEROIDS!!!!
And here's another potential fly in the ointment in the very convoluted origin equation. Don't have any details besides this news flash, but the fact that China was sensitive gives great pause...
[TABLE] [TR] [TD][LEFT][/LEFT] [HEADING=2]New data links pandemic’s origins to raccoon dogs at Wuhan market[/HEADING][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] [TABLE] [TR] [TD][LEFT]Genetic samples from the market were recently uploaded to an international database and then removed after scientists asked China about them.[/LEFT][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE]
Don't like quoting myself, but I want to clearly state what these new data show, and don't show. The nightly news said everything, but the way it was presented strongly suggested it was a validation of the Live Market Origin. You had to read between the lines to understand what it all really means.
What did this study show? [LIST] [*]That a Raccoon Dog at the Wuhan Market had COVID virus, that's all. [/LIST]
What didn't it show? [LIST] [*]How the Raccoon Dog got infected [LIST] [*]Was it transmitted to the RD by a human? [*]Was it transmitted to the RD from another RD? [*]Was it transmitted to the RD from a different animal? [*]Was it caused by a leak from a lab? [/LIST] [/LIST] As I mentioned in a previous post, it's just "interesting data", but in no way provides any definitive proof of the origins of COVID. I'm just extremely upset in how this is being presenting such that it's a very strong statement supporting the Live Market Origin. In my professional evaluation, all it does is not preclude the Live Market Origin as a possibility...
Crap, just heard it again on another news program and threw something at the TV...
Shall I go to heaven or a-fishing? - H. D. Thoreau Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
Don't like quoting myself, but I want to clearly state what these new data show, and don't show. The nightly news said everything, but the way it was presented strongly suggested it was a validation of the Live Market Origin. You had to read between the lines to understand what it all really means.
What did this study show? [LIST] [*]That a Raccoon Dog at the Wuhan Market had COVID virus, that's all. [/LIST]
What didn't it show? [LIST] [*]How the Raccoon Dog got infected [LIST] [*]Was it transmitted to the RD by a human? [*]Was it transmitted to the RD from another RD? [*]Was it transmitted to the RD from a different animal? [*]Was it caused by a leak from a lab? [/LIST] [/LIST] As I mentioned in a previous post, it's just "interesting data", but in no way provides any definitive proof of the origins of COVID. I'm just extremely upset in how this is being presenting such that it's a very strong statement supporting the Live Market Origin. In my professional evaluation, all it does is not preclude the Live Market Origin as a possibility...
Crap, just heard it again on another news program and threw something at the TV...
As any kid will say “Outdated”. No one watches TV anymore, streaming is where it’s at. Only fake news, old movies/reruns with commercials that you have to pay to watch.
Come to think of it that must be the easily manipulated group by the cabal. I might be on to something here. I mean the same group that still quotes CNN an absolute failed news outlet on the verge of going out of business still watches tv. It could very well be the common denominator to why you take drugs due to peer pressure and not the science, TV.
Hey when you need some pointers on catching instead of fishing hit me up.
As any kid will say “Outdated”. No one watches TV anymore, streaming is where it’s at. Only fake news, old movies/reruns with commercials that you have to pay to watch.
Come to think of it that must be the easily manipulated group by the cabal. I might be on to something here. I mean the same group that still quotes CNN an absolute failed news outlet on the verge of going out of business still watches tv. It could very well be the common denominator to why you take drugs due to peer pressure and not the science, TV.
Hey when you need some pointers on catching instead of fishing hit me up.
This from the person citing sources that admit to lying while on air...
Nobody lied here, they're just spinning, another game you and your cabal are Jedi Masters of...
And I'd love pointers on your seeming ability to disrupt the space/time continuum...
Shall I go to heaven or a-fishing? - H. D. Thoreau Veni. Vidi. Cepi. - with apologies to Gaius Julius Caesar
As any kid will say “Outdated”. No one watches TV anymore, streaming is where it’s at. Only fake news, old movies/reruns with commercials that you have to pay to watch.
Come to think of it that must be the easily manipulated group by the cabal. I might be on to something here. I mean the same group that still quotes CNN an absolute failed news outlet on the verge of going out of business still watches tv. It could very well be the common denominator to why you take drugs due to peer pressure and not the science, TV.
Hey when you need some pointers on catching instead of fishing hit me up.
Holy cr@p! I came to a political debate and a fishing discussion broke out! :eek:
You can lie about your income. Lie about your height. Lie about the size of your d$&k. BUT NEVER EVER lie about the number of fish you catch!
two thoughts: "other studies to date have shown that protection against more serious outcomes wanes much more slowly than against symptomatic infection, and that the shots continue to protect pretty well against these more dire events."
also, despite the quicker than expected (by some) waning, this report does not counter the notion that if everyone got vaxed and boosted, we can drive the virus into relative obscurity, with orders of magnitude reduction in opportunities for dangerous mutations.
Interesting episode of Nova last night on whale deaths. It seemed as if it had been produced in maybe 2020, as the data was from 2018 and 2019. The show discussed the migration change of Right whales from the Bay of Fundy, to both Gulf of St. Lawrence and the Cape Cod area, based on the reduction of plankton in Fundy. This new migration pattern caused a surge in whale mortality, which autopsies showed was based on boat strikes and fishing gear entanglements, as well as frustration to fishermen, as areas were closed to fishing after whale sightings. They also reported reductions in vessel speed limits based on the new whale migration patterns.
If memory serves me were not these Vaccines initially touted as 90ish % effective ? Not trying to stir the pot, just asking.
Overall, the researchers found that one month after people received two doses of either mRNA vaccine (from Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech), the vaccine from AstraZeneca, or the shot from Sinovac, the vaccine effectiveness was 53% in protecting against symptoms of COVID-19.
If memory serves me were not these Vaccines initially touted as 90ish % effective ? Not trying to stir the pot, just asking.[[/I]
Well, since you stirred the pot, here's how I understand things.... I'm sure the data showed 90ish % reduction in infection of the virus that was prevalent at the time the studies were run (on actual humans) and the data was collected. Unfortunately, not everyone got vaccinated and many folks were lax in their social distancing and mask wearing. We let the virus replicate many orders of magnitude more than it should have. In any event, whether or not it was preventable, the virus mutated, and continues to mutate. These mutations were not as readily addressed by the original vaccines. That's why effectiveness went down during the Omicron surge. You may recall that newer boosters were said to be more closely directed to the newer, more prevalent mutations. No one ever said the vaccine would last forever, and the quicker than what many expected waning in effectiveness is likely related to the new virus strains. It remains exceptionally effective at keeping folks alive and out of the hospital. Also, that "natural immunity" that was touted by some has also been shown to wane over time, especially against new strains.
